Death threats as ‘Crossfire’ exhibition remains closed

Enraged students from Charukola, the Fine Arts Institute in Dhaka University formed a human chain to protest to forced closure of Drik gallery. March 23, 2010. © Amdadul Huq/DrikNews/Majority World

According to reports from the Drik photo agency, last Saturday a young man stormed into their gallery in Dhaka and made death threats against Shahidul Alam, creator of the controversial ‘Crossfire’ exhibition. The incident was reported to the local police. For a transcript of the conversation between the man making the threats and the gallery security guard see Media Helping Media.

‘Crossfire’ is an allegorical look, through photos and video, into the alleged extra-judicial killings by the Rapid Action Battalion (RAB). For more info on the exhibition check out Shahidul’s blog. The exhibition remains forcibly closed by the police, despite protests by art students, human rights organisations and a writ petition filed by Drik with the police on 29 March.

UPDATE 01/04/10

Following legal action by Drik the police stationed in front of the gallery blocking entrance to the ‘Crossfire’ exhibition have been withdrawn. The high court hearing the case did not pass any order due to the withdrawal but stated the petitioner would be at liberty to seek such orders if the obstruction continued. Below is the press release from Drik.

GOVERNMENT CONFIRMS WITHDRAWAL OF POLICE FROM DRIK’S EXHIBITION ON ‘CROSSFIRE’

31 March 2010

Government lawyers confirmed to the Vacation Bench of the High Court today that the police deployed in front of the DRIK Gallery had been withdrawn and that there would be no obstruction to the exhibition from now on.

Dr. Alam’s lawyer submitted that police had continued to block visitors even uptil 4.30pm on 30 March and sought an assurance from the Government that there would be no further interference with visitors attending the Gallery.

Additional Attorney General MK Rahman referred to information received from the Dhaka Metropolitan Police Commissioner and the Ministry of Home Affairs, that there was no need for a police presence.

In view of these statement, the Court observed that it would not pass any order at this time but that if further obstruction to the exhibition took place before the re-opening of the High Court on 3rd April, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek necessary orders from the Vacation Bench.

Background:

The Vacation Bench of the High Court for the second day heard a writ petition challenging the continuing police action preventing the entry of viewers to the exhibition by Dr. Shahidul Alam at the DRIK Gallery entitled ‘Cross-fire”, which consists of interpretive photographs and an interactive google map which shows locations where the bodies of persons allegedly killed in ‘cross-fire’ by security forces were reportedly found.

Dr. Alam challenged the actions of the police, including Special Branch and RAB in directing him to close down the exhibition hours prior to its scheduled inauguration on 22nd March, and then the continuing police deployment in front of the DRIK Gallery in Dhanmondi from the afternoon of 22nd March onwards. As widely reported in the media, the police had prevented noted author Mahasweta Devi and other invited guests from entering the exhibition for the inauguration, and subsequently prevented other visitors to the exhibition from entering the premises.  The police stated that DRIK needed ‘prior permission’ to hold the exhibition and that going ahead with it would ‘cause unrest’.

The writ was filed by Dr. Shahidul Alam, photojournalist and MD of DRIK. The respondents to the writ petition were the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, the IG of Police, the DG of RAB, the Dhaka Metropolitan Police Commissioner and the Officer in Charge of Dhanmondi Police Station.

Threatened Voices – Global Voices site tracking suppression of free speech on-line

global voices advocacythreatened-logo-1

Threatened Voices‘ is a new on-line initiative by Global Voices Advocacy to help counter the suppression of free speech on-line.

‘It features a world map and an interactive timeline that help visualize the story of threats and arrests against bloggers worldwide, and it is a central platform to gather information from the most dedicated organisations and activists, including Committee to Protect Bloggers, The Arabic Network for Human Rights Information, Reporters without Borders, Human Rights Watch, CyberLaw Blog, Amnesty International, Committee to Protect Journalists, Global Voices Advocacy.

threatened voices mapThe site will attempt to track and map the suppression of bloggers to gather more accurate data on when, where and to what extent threats are taking place and help develop strategies and partnerships to help defend bloggers and on-line activists.

The map is interactive, allowing people to submit reports on individuals, creating a ‘blogger profile’, as well as look at different views. For example click on a country and see the individuals threatened there.

threatened voices map_individuals

And filter by type of threat. The screen shot below is by ‘arrest,’ and allows you to click on one individual, from where you can find out more info. You need to zoom in on some countries as it gets a bit cluttered and difficult to pick them out (especially on Egypt and China who appear to be in a race of their own to be ‘the world’s worst’! which I guess Egypt leads due to size of population?).

threatened voices map_arrest

The pages on individuals will be populated by articles about the blogger. It would also be nice to see some of their own articles too. Another addition, which does not appear to be there at present is a ‘Take Action‘ button that takes you to current actions by participating partner NGOs.

Linked to the site are a range of other projects that provide tools and information useful to bloggers and those working for their defence, including the ‘Access Denied‘ map looking at on-line censorship.

access denied map

All in all it looks like a cracking initiative and a good use of maps to provide info and, hopefully, encourage activism.

China censors beyond its borders – Drik exhibition on Tibet banned

If the Chinese government spouts one line consistently it is that other states should not interfere in its internal affairs. However, this obviously is a case of ‘do as I say not as I do‘. For at least the second time this year the Chinese government has tried to stop the showing of visual art that it did not like the the look of.

Drik Tibet_MG_1208

Copyright Drik

Today was supposed to be the opening of the exhibition ‘Into Exhile – Tibet 1949 – 2009′ held at the Drik photo-agency gallery in Dhaka, Bangladesh. However, as I write the gallery gate has been padlocked by the police and the gallery surrounded. The reason? “Going against the state.” Wow, not only were the Bangladesh authorities bowing to the Chinese government’s wishes but it sounds like the accepted their reason word for word too! Well, the guys at Drik are a resourceful bunch so are currently displaying the exhibition on the streets and online. However, if you go to the Drik News site you may get this warning;

Drik news site warning

Ignore it is my advice, I did and my laptop world has not ended (yet!). I wonder if those Chinese hackers are up to their old tricks again (see below)?

Things started to smell fishy when Shaidul Alam, founder and director of Drik, received a phone call from the Chinese embassy in Dhaka suggesting that the exhibition was not in everyone’s best interest. There was even mention of assisting Drik in regards to connections in China if the photos were never shown. The representative from the embassy obviously did not do his homework on either Shaidul or Drik. Such a phone call is the meat and drink of these guys. It is certainly not the first time they have faced such attempts at censorship. Undeterred, they kindly invited the embassy staff to come to the opening, say what they wanted, and even have their own exhibition at the gallery. Oddly enough they declined.

Then the other phone calls started to come. From various quarters they all had the same message, that the exhibition should not go ahead. All this culminated in Special Branch rocking up at the Drik gallery not long before the opening and locking the place down.

Drik opens exhibition on the streets in spite of pressure from t

Copyright Drik

The Chinese government’s increasing interference into other states is a worrying trend. Not satisfied with running their own complex censorship system they are attempting to make it transnational. These tactics work best on small countries such as Bangladesh, or Nepal where I am now, and smacks of bullying. So much for China the champion of the developing world. The Chinese government obviously thinks that it has jurisdiction over any content that relates to China where ever in the world it may be displayed. If pressure from the embassy does not work an unofficial cyber attack will be on its way. I guess it will not be long before the Chinese government lobbies to have ‘Green Dam Youth Escort‘ fitted on all PCs no matter where they are made.

The attempt to curtail freedom of expression in Bangladesh is not the first by the Chinese government this year. In July the Chinese authorities protested about the screening ‘10 Conditions of Love‘ a film about Rebiya Kadeer, leader of the World Uighur Congress. The film was part of the Melbourne Film Festival whose organisers refused to bow to pressure. Before the film was screened the festival website was hacked, though who was responsible is not known. The hackers displayed a Chinese flag and criticism of Rebiya on the website and were probably based in China. Here is the trailor to the film.

more about “THE 10 CONDITIONS OF LOVE“, posted with vodpod

Once upon a time the Chinese government just protested about the Dalai Lama or Kadeer visiting countries. Now it appears that any representation (or at least not state sanctioned) of the issues of either Tibetans or Uighurs is unacceptable and must be stopped. For now many countries resist the pressure from Beijing and its embassies, but this may not always be the case. Even heads of state in the UK, US and Germany, although meeting with the Dalai Lama, are careful to couch the visit in the right terms so not to anger Beijing too much. Is it too much to imagine sponsors, media groups and photo agencies be targeted in order to limit the dissemination of photos and films on these important issues and others the Chinese government would rather you do not see?

So, what is in these photo exhibitions or films that is so incendiary? I haven’t seen the photos in the Drik exhibition, and only the trailor for the film about Kadeer so I can not say for sure. You may be tempted to assume that they are controversial having caused so much fuss. However, from my experience of watching the Chinese censors at work and the government’s suppression of freedom of expression in China itself I would bet that these are less risky than the photos my friend took on his holiday to Bangkok when he was 18! I imagine they do not incite racial hatred or any such thing. The Chinese government needs to learn a thing or two about the use of images and their power. A revolution these will not make. A world wide movement these will not spawn. The attempt to ban such exhibitions and screenings will get them more attention and make more people aware of the situation of Uighurs and Tibetans inside and outside of China. In addition, the act of trying to ban these things in other countries, countries where freedom of express is highly valued, will only make people more likely to believe you are a big bully suppressing your ethnic minorities. This is a lose-lose strategy, believe me.

Of course the Chinese government is not alone in trying to censor or ban the showing of photos or films. It is just rather more unashamedly public and unapologetic about it. I guess that ‘non-interference’ thing means not only can you not tell them what to do at home but they can tell you what to think in yours.

Lessons to be learnt – Governments (at least some) are still very afraid of photos and films. Even if they are over reacting the fact they exaggerate their power is a bonus to activists using them. Fear will work against them and for us. So, the old tactic of exposing and witnessing is not dead yet.

Secondly, we have to expect more of this from China and other governments in the future. And we have to resist it, just as the guys at Drik did today. We have the tools now that make it nearly impossible for images and video to be suppressed. But the principle must be vocally defended too. The Chinese government can also be embarrassed, so remember to make some noise when they come sniffing round a photo exhibition or film festival near you.

Read more on what happened in the build-up to the exhibition at Drik here on Shaidul’s blog and here at Global Voices for a round-up of comment.

Green Dam Girl

Human rights activists don’t use humour and cartoons half as much as they should. May be the seriousness of the subject matter makes the use of such tools seem inappropriate? What ever the reason these can be great ways to mock a regime’s acts of oppression. Enter ‘Green Dam Girl‘!

green-dam-girl-450

This example focusses on the so-called ‘Green Dam Youth Escourt‘ content control software initiative by the Chinese government. Publicised in some media as yet another internet censorship tool, the story appears not so clear cut. But for our purposes that is beside the point. The cartoon uses language and image to take the piss out of the whole affair. What ever the truth ‘Green Dam Girl‘ uses popular culture and humour to make what could be a rather dry and technical issue more accessible.

For more info check out DigiActive and the OpenNet Initiative.

green-dam-girl

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 658 other followers