Glengarry Glen Ross and Oxfam Land Grabs’ campaign

In the previous post we showed a publicity campaign which manipulates pictures. In this one, we show a video which reinterpret a classic film. Oxfam America, for its campaign on land grabs, decided to copy and at the same time, to modify a famous scene in “Glengarry Glen Ross” (1992).

Glengarry Glen Ross, adapted from a play by David Mamet, tells two days in the lives of four salesmen and how they become desperate when the corporate office sends a representative, Blake, to “motivate” them. Blake, among a series of verbal abuse on the men, announces that only the top two sellers will stay in the company and the rest of them will be fired.

Here is the scene:

Here is Oxfam America’s interpretation:

I imagine that the intention of the video was not only to create surprise on the audience through the script but also to make a link with the original film. In such a way, the message will be made more powerful through its references.

Does it work in this sense? I have some doubts. It is well filmed and staged and obviously it refers to a film which had an excellent casting (Al Pacino, Kevin Spacey, Ed Harris and  Alec Balwing among others) and which received good reviews. But, do you know the film? I did not. Do the receptors of the campaing know the film? Probably not, it seems that in America it did not have commercial success.

So, was it worthy to recreate the whole scene – and obviously invest the money- to refer to a film that probably very few people have seen? And if they do not make the connection to the original film, will they able to stand the shouting to get the message and to make sense of it?

(Many thanks to Shani Orgad for letting me know about these two videos)

‘Postcards from Hell’ – single image, stereotyped nonsense?

Obviously, some countries are more attractive than others as places to live, though much will depend on where you are from and what you like. However, some are not predisposed to peaceful, easy living. But even in the most economically destitute places on the planet the picture is far more nuanced than is often represented in the media. Case in point, Foreign Policy’sPostcards from Hell.’ The piece takes an ever so fleeting look at 60 of the world’s top ‘failed states’ (they even get a numerical rating ranking how fucked they are). For each we get one photo and a paragraph describing the country’s wows. Mainly focussed on African and South Asia in includes some places that currently have or have had in the recent past some troubled times. But rather than shed light on under-reported conflicts and poverty it just slaps a huge ‘FUCKED’ label on a host of vastly different countries and situations (sometimes even whilst admitting things are on the up).

But the problems don’t end there. Some of the countries included on the list are highly questionable – Bhutan? Exactly how is this a ‘failed state’? If you are going to list it then at least mention the 100,000 people who were forced to leave and have now lived in Nepal as refugees for 15 years. Or Bangladesh, admittedly not without problems but has made good progress in recent years. And Nepal, experiencing post-conflict political difficulties, but at least they are ‘post-conflict (and FP, no serious analyst on Nepal at the moment thinks the Maoists will go back to war). I could list more – the point being, what is this list trying to achieve? Show people in wealthy countries that despite the ‘Great Recession’ that things could be a lot worse?

In this piece FP have demonstrated exactly how NOT to do a foreign correspondent photo piece. It provides just enough info to add to the over simplified images perpetuated by much of the media on these parts of our world, but not enough to show the complex, and often positive, side of things. Certainly, individuals who feature are characters, composites of poverty and violence. No lives are explored and revealed. I am surprised there wasn’t an accompanying map with big red crosses just to show us where not to go. Nonsense.

The ‘Base of the Economic Pyramid Project’

Interesting initiative by Jonathan KalanBoP (Base of the Economic Pyramid – which is basically those 4 billion people without access to financial services, living in informal settlements and paying high prices for basic commodities). Jonathan, rather than seeking out situations of poverty to document looks to ‘discover, document and share stories of remarkable social entrepreneurs, enterprises and innovations that are redefining poverty alleviation. Through visual journalism and media, teach people about the growing BoP movement and the viable alternatives to traditional aid.’

Check out this article by Jonathan on PhotoPhilanthropy.

Am I the only one who hates photo petitions?

Far too popular for their own good. Slightly cringe worthy and wacky. And still just a petition. Blah.

I am rather confused by this one from Oxfam (USA). It appears to be about ‘hunger’ and women. Not sure what signing up is supposed to achieve though? There are many ways to get interesting and useful contributions from individuals. In my opinion, this isn’t one of them.

‘Birth in Nepal’ – Al-Jazeera piece on maternal mortality

The stark reality of birth in remote regions of Nepal. Straight forward, informative, and thought provoking. Good stuff.

Enjoy please poverty: controversy on representation

The controversial film by the Dutch artist Renzo Martens, ‘Episode 3‘Enjoy Poverty’ (2009, 90 min), will be screened at the Tate Modern,  London, on 2nd June at 18.30.

In this documentary-style film, Martens investigates the representation of Congolese poverty. Throughout the film  he mocks the way the Western world exploits poverty in Africa. Essentially, Martens’ concerns are the journalists, photographers and charity workers using the Congolese for their own ends. He travels around the Congo and presents these issues to the Congolese people, telling them how their poverty is a resource that the West exploits to make money and to make themselves feel good.

Renzo Martens explores “the contradictions of humanitarianism, photojournalism, and concerned contemporary art”. He will also exposes, sometimes in a very uneasy way, the relation of power between those who watch and those who are being watched.

The film which asks ‘who owns poverty?’ and examines the ethics and economics surrounding images of post-colonial suffering  is not without contradiction. By the end you will wonder what Martens really wanted to achieve or whether he is not as complicit as the ones he mocks?

Surely, material for discussion.

Following the screening, Martens will be joined in conversation by T.J. Demosand Tamar Garb, both of UCL’s Department of Art History.

The Price of Sex: Women Speak

I like this as it is a simple, image lead campaign that focuses on the voices of the women themselves. The project looks at a handful of women who have been trafficked into the sex industry from Eastern Europe. It is made up of stills and audio testimony, as well as blog-type postings by the photographer on a map showing where the images were shot. Links to related resources and how you can help are included in the website.

Jan Sochur – hunger and rage [Burn Magazine]

Interesting discussion thread on Burn Magazine including comments on how photos can be used for a social cause and whether focusing on only the negative aspects of peoples’ lives when covering issues of poverty fails to present a rounded view of peoples’ lives and the issue.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 658 other followers