Nayantara Gurung Kakshapati – “I was just interested in telling stories.”

I first met Nayantara Gurung Kakshapati when I was exploring participatory photography in Nepal in 2009. Since then we have worked together on the issue of human rights abuses committed during the conflict in Nepal (1996-2006) on a number of occasions. I chose to work with Nayantara because she is a good photographer, plain and simple. I saw some photos she had taken of vulnerable women in the entertainment industry in Nepal. It was evident from these images, as well as her manner, that she was able to gain people’s trust. And in doing so could bring intimate stories to her audience. I also came to experience her deep understanding of her country and her ability to notice cultural nuances that were lost on me despite living in Nepal for a couple of years. I doubt most foreign photographers would have brought that depth.

When I made a trip to Nepal last December Nayantara gave me a copy of ‘The Constant Change‘ – photo.circle‘s latest book. It contained the type of images of Nepal that I had been searching for – no sadhus, no temples, no Himalayas. Just real people, real lives, taken by young local photographers. Oh, and its great! It was then that I wondered why I had never interviewed Nayantara for the Rights Exposure Project? A bit of an oversight on my part, so eventually I got round to mailing her some questions. She kindly sent me back the responses below.

***

REP: “Documentary photography is an emerging field in Nepal. The profession is very male dominated, so how did you get into it?”

NGK: “I actually got into it while I was in college in the US – it was an all women’s college. I was just interested in telling stories. In Nepal, I can count the number of working female photographers on my right hand – there are less than 5 of us here.”

REP: “You and your partner started photo.circle in 2007, what’s it all about?”

NGK: “We started photo.circle because we felt Nepali photographers needed to be stronger as a community in order to become better photographers. Although not a photographer himself, Bhushan had worked as a designer and web master for a leading Nepali media house for many years. He had worked with a lot of Nepali photographers and realized their limitations and needs. I was just starting out with photography. Since 2007, we have definitely seen many developments – we are seeing the emergence of more engaged photography and photographers. But there is still a lot to do. Once interesting work is produced, we need strong channels of distribution, we need to develop and access markets to keep photography going as a profession. These are things we are trying to figure out now.”


REP: “Photo.circle has promoted and supported local photographers. Where do you personally stand on the debate of local vs. foreign photographers covering issues in the developing world? With such a huge UN and INGO presence in Nepal many European photographers come there looking for work. How does that impact on domestic photographers?”

NGK: “I have nothing against people working trans-nationally. This is now the way of the world. But it is a lot more difficult for a photographer from Nepal to go work in the West, than for a photographer from the West to come work in Nepal. As any other profession, photography needs a market to survive and I feel only a local market can sustain careers in the long run. UN agencies and INGOs still choose to fly in photographers for short-term assignments. Why do this when there are now Nepali photographers who can deliver comparable services? In the past, the reasoning was that local photographers did not have the skills and that they were not ‘professional’ enough – but now that is changing. And local photographers offer the added advantage of knowing the local language/s, culture and socio-political context. But local photographers also have to become more professional, stop undercutting each other about rates for example – they have to gear up or be ready to get left behind.

REP: “Nepal has been photographed a great deal, but the focus has either been on sadhus, temples, mountains, or more recently the armed conflict. Was the ‘Constant Change’ photo project an attempt to get away from that?”

NGK: “Yes, ‘The Constant Change’ was a project involving 12 young Nepali photographers who were looking to intimately document stories of change that surrounded their everyday lives. These were photographers not concerned about selling Nepal to travel agencies or travel magazines. They were not trying to feed into International news media either. ‘The Constant Change’ was made primarily for a Nepali audience who could connect to the stories of change in a personal way.”


REP: “Your photographic contribution to the project is very different to the photography you usually see in Nepal. How was it received?”

NGK: “Last year I submitted a story to a national photo contest and it won first place in the ‘Story’ category. It was shot in the traditional reportage style. This year, I submitted ‘Being Nepali’ to the same contest and did not win anything. So sure, people are perhaps not sure where to place this conceptual and visual approach. But I’m pretty confident that the work has been received well by ordinary people. The issues – of the Nepali identity and ethnic federalism – are really prevalent ones for every Nepali today. Literally, as I write this today, Nepal is completely shut down outside – the Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities are demanding that federal state territories be names and mapped according to ethnicity. Through ‘Being Nepali’, my intention is to ask the ordinary Nepali person how different we are, how alike, and how much it really matters? Yes, discrimination as we have seen in the past must come to an end, but the Nepali people cannot afford to fall prey to power-hungry, populist, identity politics. I have been wanting to start a poster campaign using the portraits as a call for social harmony – but to be honest I have been feeling really powerless and depressed about this whole thing. The politicians are busy bartering, lobbying, negotiating and people have been left to fight each other on the streets. I have never been a defeatist but this week I really don’t know if these pictures would make a difference. I guess I have to try to get it out there and find out.”


REP: “Photo.circle run regular workshops, including with the likes of Philip Blenkinsop. How do you see the future of documentary photography developing in Nepal? Is it possible to make a living?”

NGK: “Yes, we have been very lucky to have some great photographers – the likes of Philip Blenkinsop, Munem Wasif, Mads Nissen- come and teach workshops for us. But I’m afraid it will never be easy to make a living as a documentary photographer. Here or anywhere in the world. The local editorial market is really small and Nepali photographers don’t have the network/s to plug into the regional and international editorial market, yet. Same goes for grants. I think for now, the solution will be to try and harness the local and regional I/NGO market, sell stock, sell prints, develop other skills like video, multimedia, write, consult, do workshops, design websites – do whatever it takes to keep you going, and keep the personal projects going on the side.”  

REP: “You guys are pretty friendly with Shahidul Alam from Drik. How have they supported the work of photo.circle?”

NGK: “Shahidul has been an amazing friend and mentor to photo.circle and to us personally. He is a true visionary – and is extraordinarily generous with his time, guidance and contacts. Photo.circle has had really productive collaborations with the PATHSHALA South Asian Media Academy and DRIK in Bangladesh. We have learnt a lot about photography, about how to run an organization to develop the medium, and about what kind of photographers we want to be. It is really great to have such inspiring expertise so close to home – and not have to always look to Europe or the US for expertise and inspiration.”  

REP: “What are you working on now”

NGK: “Personally, I would really like to continue with ‘Being Nepali’ – my country is so diverse (and I mean this the truest, non-cliched way) – there are many people/places I would like to cover still.  And I would like to get the poster campaign going for next week. I am sure there are people out there who don’t want to cut Nepali into little pieces and fight over them or with each other – it will be good to see the solidarity and wash some of this hopelessness away. We are also of course working to make photo.circle a more engaging and accessible platform for Nepali photographers. As an organization we are trying to figure out how to be more efficient and cost effective. There are several workshops in the pipe-line, and we are planning an exhibition showcasing the work of this 86-year-old Nepali photographer who’s work (12,000 images) we have just finished digitizing. Despite the dirty politics, it is an exciting time to live and work in Nepal, especially for someone who wants to tell stories.”

Caravan – Amnesty Nepal campaign for Safe Migration

Each year hundreds of thousands of Nepalis go abroad for work. The money they send home makes up over 20% of the country’s GDP. Each individual has a dream of what their journey will be like. Yet many of those dreams turn into nightmares, with problems starting even before they have left their home village. Amnesty International Nepal believes that if there was political consensus across parties in the country on five safe migration policies labour and human rights would be better protected. Amnesty’s ‘migrant worker’ caravan is touring the country to mobilize support on this important issue. They are lobbying parliamentarians and collecting signatures in towns along the way. You can also contribute by signing the petition online at http://www.amnestynepal.org/appeal-for-action/

Korean version of ‘False Promises’ – exploitation of Nepalese migrant workers

Here is the Korean language version of Amnesty International’s short film ‘False Promises – Exploitation and forced labour of Nepalese migrant workers.’

You can find out more on this issue by reading the report or a summary at the Amnesty International website.

False Promises – forced labour & exploitation of Nepalese migrant workers

</object>

This video accompanies new research published by Amnesty International this week on the trafficking of Nepalese migrant worker for labour exploitation. The piece was shot by two Nepalese film makers to a brief myself and the AI researcher developed with them. Dinesh and Ramyata (who previously worked on Julie Bridgham’s ‘Sari Soldiers‘) of Sutra Films did a fantastic job.

The 10 minute film was produced as a visual summary of the report findings, with the voice of returnee migrants a prominent part throughout. This is supported by the inclusion of local experts. It was first screened at a press conference to launch AI’s research findings in Kathmandu on 13 December. The film was distributed to the local and international media. A Korean version has been prepared for screening in Seoul due to the increasing number of Nepalese migrating there. We also hope it will gain viewers in Malaysia and other major destinations for Nepalese migrant workers.

Interview with photographer Sophie Gerrard

Women chat in recovery ward following successful cataract surgery, AJEH, Bihar, India. Copyright Sophie Gerrard

I came across Sophie Gerrard’s work via a recent article on the BBC News website about an eye hospital in Bihar, India. I was impressed enough to have a dig around on her website and found another interesting project on maternal health. What struck me was the balance in her approach – not overly dramatic and with a positive thread running through it. At times it borders on the minimal, with artistic over-tomes, which will not be to everyone’s taste. However, I liked what I saw so got in touch and Sophie kindly agreed to answer some questions.

***

REP – Hi Sophie, your work predominantly focuses on social and environmental issues. What is striking is that rather than emphasize the negative and over dramatize the issue, you take a positive approach. You seem solution orientated. Is this a conscious working method?

SG – For the most part yes, ‘Protectors of Sight‘ is certainly a positive story. The story being told here is of a remarkable rural eye hospital in remote Bihar, India where they are working against all the odds curing the sight of hundreds of people everyday for free. It’s a positive story and it’s one which deserves attention. The hospital there is doing such incredible work. People are generally interested in hearing about it. I think the positive solution part of the story is often what the audience engages with the most. I think to make work which lets an audience know about something new. So in this case, the story of blindness is not new, but the way this hospital is trying to eradicate the issue is very new to most of those who see the photographs. That’s what has got people I meet, talking about the project and the issue of cataract blindness in that part of India, and that’s the whole point.

I’m not a great fan of a photographic or documentary approach which presents an audience with nameless victims and their plight without specific details and specific voices. People are interested in people, facts figures and statistics mean very little until a human face or voice makes us empathise and start to see things from a difference perspective. I think photography and audio can do that. If we hear the voices and thoughts of those affected by the various social and environmental issues I photograph, then I hope that means their story is communicated that little bit more successfully.

Asha Subhash Gabhale, 20, with her two day old baby, Chaphachapada, India. Copyright Sophie Gerrard

REP – You have worked with several NGOs, including your latest project on the Akhand Jyoti Eye hospital in Bihar. What has your experience been like working with charitable organizations, how much say do you have in the tone and focus of the work?
SG – I was very lucky in working with The Savitri Waney Charitable Trust and the Akhand Jyoti Eye Hospital in that their message was very clear to me and straightforward. The organisations were easy to work with, the story I had to tell was, in many ways, quite simple: There are huge numbers of cataract blind people in Bihar, India. The hospital seeks out those blind people and brings them to hospital for surgery, their sight is cured for free.
Before I went to Bihar, the Trust and I discussed how we could approach the story. For instance did I want to tell the story of one individual, one family, did I want to focus on the eye camps, or on the hospital we discussed a few ways of telling the story, and what important points had to be covered and then I was left to it. I was given the luxury of time to spend with the people at the hospital, I was also given time to travel to outreach eye screening camps, to visit blind individuals in their homes and travel with them to the hospital for surgery. I met blind people, stayed with them in their houses, photographed and interviewed them. I traveled kilometres on foot over searingly hot dry river beds and through swollen rivers to see the outreach camps where hundreds of rural people gather to have their eyes screened. I was accompanied and looked after, and basically I was able to photography anything I wanted. I was given no boundaries and there were no limitations.
The story I then edited and put together is the one I wanted to show. Sure, the charity have chosen their images and I have chosen mine, but the whole collection is a thourough and true reflection of that place and that situation. I am very pleased with the way we’ve all been able to work together. The exhibition I am showing of the work, ‘Protectors of Sight’, was entirely curated by me. I chose which images and information I wanted to use to tell the story. The charity helped me with that by sponsoring the exhibition but they have left all creative decisions to me.

AJEH Mastichak, Bihar, India. Copyright Sophie Gerrard

I’ve been lucky enough to work with NGOs and charities who are either very used to working with photographers and can explain clearly what they want what they wish to say and why, or with small charities who are happy to introduce me to their projects and then leave me to it. In every scenario I’ve always felt very supported, and yet at the same time very free to work as I wish and make the pictures I feel I need to make. That for me is a good combination.
REP – Can you tell us a bit about how your work has been used? Much of it looks like it would be used to encourage new donors or feedback to existing ones.
SG – The ‘Protectors of Sight’ exhibition and photographs were used by The Savitri Waney Charitable Trust in order to document the various projects they support. A gallery of my images can be seen on their website. Images from the project have also been used by the hospital to do the same. The photo-film has been used at fundraising events, in the annual newsletter, it has been distributed online and has been featured on the BBC. Previous projects such as ‘E-wasteland‘, have been used by other NGOs. ‘E-wasteland’ was used by Greenpeace International in one of their global campaigns to highlight the dangers of toxic e-waste in workshops and recycling yards in India. I am delighted that my work can be used in these ways.

Acid pollution, Mandoli, Delhi, India. Copyright Sophie Gerrard

REP – Most of your stories are from India. Is this by chance or is there a deeper attraction? How do you find working some where so far from home and so different? How do people react to you?

SG – I’ve always been attracted to India, my parents lived and worked for an NGO working in India and in Pakistan in the 1970s and I’ve always been attracted by that part of the world. I’m perfectly happy working far from home, I enjoy travelling, discovering new places, meeting new people, which photographer wouldn’t. You wouldn’t choose to do this work otherwise. I’m used to being the visitor, the one who is asking questions. Even when I’m working in Scotland and nearer to home that is still the case. It’s up to me to make people feel relaxed around me, and to react well towards me. If I am photographing them over a period of time (which is how I prefer to work – spending time and making work slowly) then it’s in my interest to develop and establish a relationship relatively quickly and to try and gain trust. I am not out to trick anyone or to misrepresent anyone. I ask questions and I am curious, I then try to portray that information in my photographs, with varying degrees of success. I’ve been lucky, I’ve nearly always been welcomed and treated with great generosity and kindness by those who have let me photograph them.

Sindhu gathers her medical box before home visits, Gande, rural Maharashtra, India. Copyright Sophie Gerrard

REP – How did you make the leap from environmental science to photography? Any tips for young photographers starting out on how to carve out a career in photography focusing on social issues?
SG – I started my career as an environmental scientist. After a short while in that job however I knew that I wanted to be the one reporting and documenting the stories we worked on. I had also been travelling in South East Asia around that time and had become obsessed with the work of Don McCullin and the other war photographers in Vietnam. I decided then that I was going to return to art college to study documentary photography. It seemed a logical way to combine what I was most interested in. I then went on to study for an MA in photojournalism and I’ve been working as a docuentary photographer ever since I completed that course. I’m passionate about visual story telling, I feel that if you can catch someone’s attention with something and make them stop and take a second look, then that’s powerful. Someone who inspired me greatly was Tim Hetherington and his early work from Indonesia and also the wall graffitti photographs from Liberia. His visual approach to an abstract form of documentary and story telling using medium format was what led me towards the camera I use. I enjoy the slow process and the discipline of working at a pace which i think for me generates more intimate photographs and details which help tell a story.
In terms of advice, I’d recommend being thick skinned, resilient and driven. Find a subject matter that interests you and find a way to make photographs about it. Be prepared that that might not always be from commissions and jobs. A lot of what I have done has been self initiated and funded through other photography work, or from grants. So, many Charities and NGOs are increasingly looking to reduce their costs and their budgets. Look at work that others are making and be informed.

Community worker during a house visit, Baigau, rural Maharashtra, India. Copyright Sophie Gerrard

REP – What next? Anything interesting in the pipeline?
SG – Right now I’m working on promoting my exhibiton ‘Protectors of Sight’ and trying to find some follow on venues for the work to be exhibited in. I’ve got some plans to show it in Edinburgh, my home town. The Photographers’ Gallery in London are featuring the work in their Print Sales and I’m delighted about that. Project wise I’m working on some new shorter term editorial projects in the UK at the moment and applying for funding. At the same time as trying to do as much editorial work as I can. It’s a slightly difficult balancing act. My current personal work is a project in Scotland looking at land use and protected land. It’s in the early stages but I’m keen to continue it in the next few weeks. My main interests are environmental stories and specifically looking at the human and social impact of environmental issues. It’s time to give those personal stories some more of my attention now and I’m really looking forward to doing that.

Newborn, five days old, Baigau, rural Maharastra, India. Copyrights Sophie Gerrard

Saving sight in Nepal

Following on from Sophie Gerrard’s piece on cataract surgery in Bihar here is a piece by the BBC on a similar scheme in Nepal.

‘Protectors of Sight’ – photofilm by Sophie Gerrard

I came across Sophie Gerrard’s work a couple of weeks back when the BBC featured her latest piece on the Akhand Jyoti Eye hospital in Bihar. It is beautiful, positive and inspiring. It does not linger on the negative nor over dramatize the issue. Other work, like ‘The Right to Life’ on maternal health in India, strike a similar tone and are in stark contrast to other rather shrill pieces of work out there in NGO-ville. Take a look at her site here.

ネパールの強制失踪~司法の重要性~

Amnesty International Japan feature and video on the killing of the Dhanusa 5 in Nepal. For the English version go here.

</object>

‘The Significance of Justice’ – disappearances in Nepal

For International Day of the Disappeared Amnesty International has produced a video looking at the disappearance of five young men in Janakpur, Nepal.  Known as the ‘Dhanusha 5′, the men were taken by security forces in 2003 at the height of the ten year civil war and never seen again. Their remains were recently exhumed by the National Human Rights Commission by the banks of a river. The police investigation into the killing has never progressed and no one has been arrested or prosecuted for this grave crime.

</object>

You can take action here.

Sri Lankan government challenges C4 claims

Following on from Channel 4′s documentary on alleged war crimes committed by both sides in Sri Lanka during the end phase of the civil war, the Sri Lankan government has upped its propaganda offensive.

The BBC’s James Haviland reports that the government is now analysing the footage shown by C4 (as well as the UN Human Rights Council) that appears to show security forces executing prisoners in order to prove it had been tampered with. The focus is on the sound track – with the C4/UN version having Sinhala being spoken and the government’s version Tamil. The accusation is that members of the LTTE dressed up in Sri Lankan army uniforms and committed the atrocity. Last week the UN claimed that two independent experts both ruled that the video and audio had not been tampered with.And so the claims and counter claims continue.

It is easy to dismiss the Sri Lankan government’s rather biased propaganda rebuttal as an obvious attempt to muddy the waters. A look at the Ministry of Defence web site will reveal a long and detailed critique of the C4 piece, though none of it is particularly convincing in countering the basic accusations of war crimes. We may feel that very few will accept its analysis as objective, and so feel the authenticity of the footage will stand up to these assaults. But in Sri Lanka and other parts of South Asia the government’s campaign will have significant traction. And although its allies at the UN will not be fooled they may just rely on this ‘evidence’ to quieten calls for an inquiry into alleged war crimes.

Trophy footage shot by security forces – though morally repugnant – can often be the only direct visual evidence of the human rights violations that took place. Governments will bust a gut – like the Sri Lankan’s are now doing – to discredit damning evidence (or put it down to a few ‘rotten apples’). In these situations the veracity of accusations of crimes will begin to rest on such evidence (as opposed to witness testimony) and so the undermining of such evidence can have a far reaching impact on your campaign. It is thus vital that you are on solid ground with such footage before you put your wait behind it. Whether the footage C4 and the UN have in this case is authentic I can’t say. I suspect the Sri Lankan government’s claims will be weak and find little support but will be enough to sow seeds of doubt amongst a receptive audience at thome. My experience of the Sri Lankan government’s propaganda machine (including pro-government media) suggests they are willing to tell blatant lies despite them being easily rebutted.

C4′s ‘Sri Lanka’s Killing Fields’ can be viewed here.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 658 other followers